← Back to blog

AAC for autistic people: still mostly request-training for children

AAC for autistic people: still mostly request-training for children

NeuroDifferent Research Digest

Contents

In one sentence

Across 69 experimental AAC studies with autistic people, most work still targets children, aided devices, behavioural teaching, and simple requesting — with very little on adults, generalisation, or quality of life.

What the researchers did

Authors systematically searched six databases for peer-reviewed experimental AAC studies with autistic children or adults published in English after 2013. Sixty-nine papers met criteria. Studies were grouped by age, AAC type, teaching approach, and outcomes; quality was rated with Scientific Merit Rating Scales. Facilitated communication–type methods were excluded.

What they found

  • Most studies focused only on children; only three examined AAC outcomes with adults.
  • Speech-generating devices and low-tech picture exchange dominated; behavioural techniques were common.
  • Outcomes were largely proximal (for example, making requests), with few measures of skill generalisation or distal outcomes such as wellbeing, relationships, learning, or employment.
  • Overall study quality was often limited by design and diagnostic ascertainment gaps.

What this means for families and therapists

Limitations and what we don't know yet

  • Narrative synthesis of heterogeneous designs; many low-quality studies.
  • English-only, post-2013 filter.
  • Does not prove which AAC system is “best” for any one person.

This is a plain-language summary of The Predominant Focus Is Still on Teaching Children to Make Requests: A Systematic Review of AAC for Autistic Adults and Children by Mifsud S., Thomas D., Bowron R. et al., International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (2026). Source license: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. It is not medical advice — talk to a qualified clinician before changing therapy.

← Back to blog